12/28/2023 0 Comments Download the new DxO PhotoLab 7.0.1.76![]() Finally, I got this nice balanced colour contrast, which in conjunction with a smooth vignette directs the viewers eye to the center and its contrasting little boats, the brighter reddish reflection as result of the ‘burning sky’. One is controlling light and vibrancy and the second one colour temperature (lowered by 200° Kelvin). So, I cropped off the empty sky and added local adjustments (2x graduated filters). Instead I tried to find out about the scenery’s appearance and what has impact. ![]() – Well, and I didn’t bother at all with different light speckles in the water. To me, the nice glow suits the ‘burning sky’ very well. The building’s silhouettes appear clearer, while the glow spread / aura in the skyline’s center is diminshed without vanishing. When toggling on/off you see the enhancement on the outsides. – You will find out, how I set CA corrections (no manual). Just open the pic with “my” dop-file (maybe better to copy everything in a separate folder). What i find strange in this particular image is the colors in the water surface. I see that you leave the greenisch low left to mid left be present, (green bridgelight i think) I don’t know enough of this but is CA not a more object aura kind of thing?Ī mis a linement of light? not a glow spread like this? Once I replace my old “.dop” file with yours, do I need to do something else to get PL4 to recognize your “.dop” – ref to post #224 What am I missing? Your image is “lower” than mine, so it should be instantly obvious. I thought all I needed to do was replace my. I deleted every file in that folder other than the “.nef” and again copied your “.dop” into the folder. I downloaded your “.dop” file, put it into my folder for PL4 and the image didn’t change - it was still my last view, with my watermark. When important parts are not (cannot be) illuminated, present them as clear silhouettes as you did (compare to the difficult trial to bring back colour to your fisherman). ![]() Sunset pics are often counter light scenes. – Your photo is sharp, otherwise all antennas, sailing boats and cranes wouldn’t be crisp enough ![]() That your lens is prone to some degree of Chromatic Aberation (see comment from solved this problem (and more) in _MJM2169 -Biscayne Jet Ski and – The report from ExifTool is simply misleading, to say the least.Ĭhecking your original photo _MJM2169 -Biscayne Jet Ski and Miami.nef you see, Your 24mm lens can be focused as close as 0,30 cm (~12"). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |